biteho.com

Rainbow Six Siege has long had a problem with team-killing, but developer Ubisoft has a new solution going live soon to help alleviate the issue. Reverse friendly fire, as it’s called, has been in testing for a while and arrives on public PS4, Xbox One, and PC servers on May 8.

Essentially, the system is designed to punish griefers by dealing the damage to them, rather than the poor teammate being hit. Offenders will get a brief grace period–accidents happen, after all–after which any further damage dealt will be reversed, meaning the innocent player receives no damage and the guilty party will be injured themselves.

The system applies to all primary and secondary weapons, as well as direct hits from most unique Operator gadgets. Some explosive items are exempt–some by design, and some because of a bug Ubisoft says it will fix in a future update.

The developer says the method as it stands “is not our final version of the system,” which will continue to be tweaked according to data and player feedback. It has already announced changes to the system coming during Siege’s Year 4, Season 2: “We will introduce situations where the system will activate for the whole squad,” the company said. “How gadgets will react and behave under Reverse Friendly Fire will also be fine-tuned.” Read the full patch notes for reverse friendly fire’s current iteration below, via Ubisoft.

Rainbow Six Siege Reverse Friendly Fire Update

When a player abuses the friendly fire mechanic to grief their teammates, this system is activated. We believe that this first version will be a positive step forward in our fight against team killing while maintaining the same intensity and high stakes gameplay that is core to the Rainbow Six Siege experience.

The Y4S1 release of RFF is not our final version of the system. Future iterations and improvements will continue based off data and player feedback.

Community feedback so far has been invaluable and allowed us to make early iterations to the system. For example, RFF can now activate based on total friendly damage. In these cases, there is no validation screen for the offending player’s teammates. We are also striving to make it clearer how operators and gadgets will react to this system. We have consolidated some guidelines below for your reference.

Effect Of Reverse Friendly Fire

On Weapons And Thrown Objects

Impacts:

• Primary/secondary weapons
• Direct hits from thrown unique gadgets
• Exothermic-S Torch (Maverick)
• SK 4-12 (Buck)
• Mounted LMG (Tachanka; regardless of who’s using the turret)
• M120 CREM (Ash) when the breaching round directly hits someone
• KS79 Lifeline (Zofia)
• Airjab Launcher (Nomad)
• Pest Launcher (Mozzie)

Before RFF activation:

• Can cause damage to teammates
• Will count towards activating RFF

After RFF activation:

• Teammates will not receive damage
• Will reverse damage dealt

On Explosives

Impacts:

• Generic gadgets (frag grenade, C4, breach charge) that results in an explosion*
• Gas Grenade (Smoke)
• TAC MKO asphyxiating bolts (Capitão)
• M120 CREM (Ash) when the breaching round explodes
• Cluster Charge (Fuze)

*Explosive gadgets that do not do damage (i.e. stun grenades, Ying’s Candela) will not be affected by RFF in any way

Before RFF activation:

• Can cause damage to teammates
• Will count towards activating RFF

After RFF activation:

• Can cause damage to teammates
• Does not reverse damage dealt*

*Explosives currently will continue to damage teammates even under RFF. This is not intended and will be fixed in Season 2.

Exceptions*:

• Claymore
• Entry Denial Device (Kapkan)
• X-Kairos pellets (Hibana)
• Exothermic Charge (Thermite)

*These explosives do not trigger RFF. While under RFF, these also do not reverse damage dealt and can continue to damage teammates. This can change in the future with feedback and further game design considerations.

On Drones And Operator Cameras

Impacts:

• Evil Eye (Maestro)
• Shock Drone (Twitch and Mozzie)

Before RFF activation:

• Can cause damage to teammates
• Will count towards activating RFF

After RFF activation:

• Teammates will not receive damage
• Will reverse damage dealt (onto the drone/camera)

More To Come

Further changes for Reverse Friendly Fire will come during Year 4 Season 2. We will introduce situations where the system will activate for the whole squad. How gadgets will react and behave under Reverse Friendly Fire will also be fine-tuned based on data and feedback. We look forward to sharing future developments with you.

We welcome any additional feedback on the Rainbow Six subreddit!

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds might be one of the world’s biggest games, but its parent company, Tencent, has decided to discontinue the game in China. Despite the country being a huge market–70 million Chinese customers played PUBG Mobile every day–Tencent has shut down the game and replaced it with a more patriotic alternative.

Tencent’s reasoning is the Chinese government’s refusal to allow in-app purchases in PUBG Mobile. In response, the replacement, Game for Peace, has been given a socialist makeover to meet the strict government regulations. According to Reuters, Tencent described Game for Peace as a tactical shooting game that “pays tribute to the blue sky warriors that guard our country’s airspace,” in reference to the Chinese air force.

Changes include the absence of gore and blood in Game for Peace, and characters sit up and wave goodbye when they’re killed. However, analyst Cui Chenyu said Game for Peace is otherwise “almost exactly the same” as PUBG. “The gameplay, the background, the graphic design, and the characters, they’re almost the same,” she said. In addition, players have reported their progress has carried over from PUBG to Game for Peace.

Tencent, on the other hand, says the two games belong to “very different genres.” The issue is complicated further because although Tencent owns a stake in PUBG’s publisher, Krafton (formerly known as Bluehole), and holds the exclusive license to publish PUBG in China, it does not own the PUBG brand outright. A spokesperson for Krafton told Reuters the publisher was looking into PUBG’s status in China and declined to comment further.

PUBG Mobile launched in the west in 2018, and it will soon be joined by another huge battle royale game: EA announced just recently that Apex Legends is coming to mobile.

The Xbox One has been around since 2013, which is, scarily, six years ago. With console cycles typically lasting between five and seven years, that means we should be due a new Xbox pretty soon. However, there’s the complicating factor that this generation included mid-cycle upgrades, the PS4 Pro and the Xbox One X.

Regardless, we know Microsoft is working on the next Xbox console, and there’ve been a fair few reports surrounding what to expect. Without further ado, let’s dig into everything we know about the next Xbox.

What is the new Xbox?

Microsoft might not have unveiled its new Xbox just yet, but it is definitely working on it. The company confirmed as such during E3 last year. In fact, it could even be multiple consoles on the way. Xbox boss Phil Spencer said in June 2018 that Microsoft is “deep into architecting the next Xbox consoles where we will once again deliver on our commitment to set the benchmark for console gaming.”

Of course, the pluralizing of ‘console’ could mean Spencer was referring in part to the Xbox One S All-Digital Edition, which was announced just recently. However, the latter half of his quote–about setting the benchmark for console gaming–surely refers to a new generation, where it sounds as if Microsoft wants to come out swinging with the most powerful console available, just as it did with the Xbox One X.

Reports from Thurrott suggest the new Xbox consoles are being developed under the umbrella codename Scarlett. Two consoles are in the works, say the reports: one is a high-power machine codenamed Anaconda that will be approximately the same price as the PS5, while the other is a budget-orientated machine known as Lockhart. The latter is potentially a streaming-centric device that does not boast much processing power itself; rather, it will ostensibly utilize Microsoft’s nascent xCloud technology to play games via the cloud.

When is the new Xbox’s release date likely to be?

Microsoft hasn’t spoken about its timeline for the new Xbox consoles’ release date(s). However, the consoles are not expected to launch until Fall 2020. For comparison’s sake, we don’t precisely know when the PS5 will launch either, but in May 2018 the then-head of PlayStation, John Kodera, said that the PS5 was “three years” away. However, plans change, and it’s also possible Kodera was merely trying to keep a lid on the rumors that were flying around at the time which were saying the PS5 would be released as soon as 2019.

What about E3 2019?

Of course, E3 2019 is just around the corner, so can we expect to hear more about the new Xbox consoles at the convention? The answer, according to a report from Jeux Video, is yes. The site states Microsoft plans to reveal its new Xbox consoles during its E3 2019 press conference. Of course, this is all conjecture for now, but Xbox boss Phil Spencer has stated the company intends to be “as big at E3” as it’s ever been.

Do we know the new Xbox console specs and price?

Unlike Sony, Microsoft has so far kept quiet about the internal specifications of its new consoles. However, all the reports point to both Anaconda and Lockhart ditching hard drives in favor of the quicker solid state storage option–a move the PS5 is also making. Of course, if those reports are proven accurate and Lockhart is essentially a streaming box, it’s likely the console will eschew a disc drive and state-of-the-art specs, relying instead on Microsoft’s xCloud streaming service for its playing power. Jeux Video has reported the following specs for the two Scarlett consoles:

	Xbox Lockhart	Xbox Anaconda
CPU	Custom eight core	Custom eight core
GPU	Custom NAVI 4+ teraflops	Custom NAVI 12+ teraflops
RAM	12 GB, GDDR6	16 GB, GDDR6
Storage	1 TB SSD, 1 + GB / s	1 TB SSD, 1 + GB / s

The site also reports the Anaconda price will be around $500, which is the same price the Xbox One X launched with in 2017. Unverified rumors from Reddit place Lockhart, meanwhile, at around $250, which would put it at the same price point as the newly-launched Xbox One S All-Digital Edition, which also forgoes a disc drive. These are yet to be substantiated by any reputable source, however.

Sony has announced another State of Play livestream event this week, with a few announcements planned. The brief presentation will only last about 10 minutes, and that time will give more details on the PS4 remake of MediEvil and an unannounced new game. You can watch it right here as it happens.

This is the second State of Play, and Sony’s approach to these announcement streams has been very similar to Nintendo Direct presentations. The first State of Play in March was a good deal longer, and included announcements or new glimpses of eight games. That included several PSVR reveals, including the announcement of Iron Man VR and No Man Sky‘s upcoming VR update.

Sony State of Play Stream Start Times

• 3 PM PT
• 6 PM ET
• 11 PM BST
• 8 AM (Friday, May 10) AEST

In giving word about this presentation, Sony also took a moment to announce something that won’t be shown. It won’t house any new information about the next PlayStation–presumably to be named the PlayStation 5.

These individual State of Play streams may be where we hear most of Sony’s announcements this year, as the company has dropped out of E3. SIE Worldwide Studios head Shawn Layden explained that the company feels the event hasn’t necessarily kept up with the changing needs of the industry.

Though it won’t be at E3, though, it has already started sharing its plans for the next generation, making it the first company to the starting gate. Those plans include backwards compatibility with PS4 games and a re-commitment to support PSVR. Read up on everything we know about PS5.

You need a javascript enabled browser to watch videos.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.

This video has an invalid file format.

Sorry, but you can’t access this content!

Ubisoft appears to be preparing for a big Ghost Recon reveal, with a world premiere event being streamed on Thursday, May 9. If you want to see what’s next, you can watch it all go down right here.

The event teaser was light on details, but it doesn’t appear to be tied to Ghost Recon Wildlands. That game launched in 2017, and it has been supported with a steady stream of downloadable content and live events ever since. In fact, Wildlands just received another dose of content last week. The distinction from Wildlands suggests the event will focus on something new for the Ghost Recon series, possibly a full sequel.

The timing of this event is conspicuously close to E3, where Ubisoft has a press conference scheduled for Monday, June 10. Scheduling a reveal event now could either set the stage for a more in-depth look at E3, or just give the company more time to focus on other parts of its lineup.

Wildlands received a mixed reception at launch but has fostered a devoted following through continued support. Ubisoft has shifted toward long-term support for many of its games, including multiplayer titles like Rainbow Six Siege and For Honor along with single-player games like Assassin’s Creed Odyssey.

“As only the second open world game in the Clancyverse, Ghost Recon: Wildlands is a middlingly safe tactical shooter and a slightly wasted opportunity given the ambitious scope of its seemingly boundless map,” Miguel Concepcion wrote in GameSpot’s review. “While its main strength is its mission diversity, it doesn’t take long to lose the motivation after reaching El Sueno’s doorstep. Even with a foursome of highly trained friends, Wildlands eventually reveals its diminishing returns. The feeling of positive immediacy and dopamine hits begin to wane sooner than you expected from a game with such a large and diverse world.”

Ghost Recon World Premiere Start Times

• 11:30 AM PT
• 2:30 PM ET
• 7:30 PM BST
• 4:30 AM (Friday May 10) AET

There’s something about playing a real-life killer that is a magnet for actors when they want to be taken seriously. Charlize Theron’s Oscar-winning portrayal of Aileen Wuornos in the 2002 movie Monster elevated her to the ranks of Hollywood’s most in-demand stars, while Steve Carell went from lovable comedian to intense character actor when he took on the role of sociop John du Pont in Foxcatcher. Now, Zac Efron is the latest star to attempt to shed his former teen idol image, by playing Ted Bundy, one of America’s most notorious serial killers.

While Theron famously underwent a physical transformation to play Wuornos, Efron was cast for his looks. Bundy was known for being a smart, handsome, charismatic mass murderer whose trials were attended by college girls eager to get close to him, and Efron’s casting makes perfect sense. Unfortunately, his compelling performance is stranded in a movie that makes some serious missteps in its attempts to present a new spin on the serial killer film.

Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile takes its title from the description leveled at Bundy by the judge in his 1979 sentencing. It’s a provocative title and suggests a dark plunge into the depraved mind of a relentless kidnapper, rapist, necrophile, and killer who admitted to murdering 30 women between 1974 and 1978, but whose victim count could potentially be far higher. Director Joe Berlinger wanted to do something different, though. His movie focuses less on the crimes itself, and more on the cult of personality around Bundy, and most specifically his relationship with two women in his life–long-time girlfriend Elizabeth Kendall (Lily Collins), and Carole Ann Boone (Kaya Scodelario), the woman he married while awaiting trial.

The film has a flashback structure, starting with Kendall visiting him on death row, and then moving back to the start of their relationship. Bundy was first arrested in 1974 from an anonymous tip-off, and the bulk of the film sees him either on bail or in jail, awaiting trial. Throughout this time Kendall stands by him, refusing to believe the terrible crimes that Bundy has been accused of and that he consistently denies, despite the evidence and trail of victims strewn across several states. As their relationship slowly breaks down, old flame Boone re-enters his life.

It would be a mistake to think that a serial killer movie has to wallow in violent imagery to be effective. The decision to not show any of Bundy’s murders–with the exception of one brief moment toward the end–was a very deliberate one, and it could be argued that, like Kendall and Boone, as an audience we are removed from the true horror of his crimes. The difference is that we know what Bundy did, but Efron’s easy charm and the movie’s insistence on almost never portraying him in a negative light ultimately cheapens the subject matter and lessens the dramatic impact.

Much of the film is spent with Bundy proclaiming his innocence while getting moved from state to state, jailhouse to courthouse, and occasionally planning an escape. It simply doesn’t make for very interesting viewing, and little effort is spent to get inside Bundy’s head. The movie is not a thriller, as the outcome is well known, but neither is it a horror movie or effective psychological drama; instead we’re left with a recreation of already well-documented events (Bundy’s trial was the first televised in the US) and a very shallow portrayal of real-life characters. No time is spent on the victims of his crimes either, and after a while it’s easy to forget that this is a movie about a serial killer at all.

In their attempts to desensationalize the material, Berlinger and screenwriter Michael Werwie omit some of the more interesting aspects of Bundy’s life. Bundy made two separate escapes–once from a courthouse, after which he nearly died after spending six days in the mountains of Colorado, the other from jail in a meticulously planned escape–but both are dealt with very quickly before he’s back in prison. The other curious aspect is that Bundy–a law student before his arrest–represented himself in court. But again, while we see Bundy doing this, it bears no resemblance to the manic figure he actually was while appearing in court, and little time is spent on the insane media circus that built up around his appearances. Any of these aspects could’ve made for a more interesting movie than the one we’re ultimately presented with.

Despite the often underwritten characters, the performances are good. Even though she is sidelined in the movie’s last third, Collins evokes sympathy as Kendall, who utterly falls under Bundy’s manipulative spell, while Scodelario cuts a tragic figure as Boone, who marries him as he awaits sentencing. Even the smaller roles are filled with famous faces–John Malkovich, Haley Joel Osment, and Big Bang Theory’s Jim Parsons all appear at various stages (as does Metallica’s James Hetfield in a fleeting cameo).

Berlinger is best known for his documentary work, including the brilliant, devastating Paradise Lost movies. He had already tackled Bundy in the Netflix true crime series The Bundy Tapes, and while this series is not his best work, it does offer more insight than the movie version. In a way, Bundy is a hard subject to understand–he only confessed to his killings at the end of his life, and much of what is known about him has already been documented various times over the years. But given Berlinger’s familiarity with the subject, it’s disappointing that Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile avoids exploring the true horror of his crimes, while offering little else in its place.